Balanced Combinations of Solutions in Multi-Objective Optimization

For every list of integers x_1, ..., x_m there is some j such that x_1 + ... + x_j - x_{j+1} - ... - x_m \approx 0. So the list can be nearly balanced and for this we only need one alternation between addition and subtraction. But what if the x_i are k-dimensional integer vectors? Using results from topological degree theory we show that balancing is still possible, now with k alternations. This result is useful in multi-objective optimization, as it allows a polynomial-time computable balance of two alternatives with conflicting costs. The application to two multi-objective optimization problems yields the following results: - A randomized 1/2-approximation for multi-objective maximum asymmetric traveling salesman, which improves and simplifies the best known approximation for this problem. - A deterministic 1/2-approximation for multi-objective maximum weighted satisfiability

Space-efficient informational redundancy

AbstractWe study the relation of autoreducibility and mitoticity for polylog-space many-one reductions and log-space many-one reductions. For polylog-space these notions coincide, while proving the same for log-space is out of reach. More precisely, we show the following results with respect to nontrivial sets and many-one reductions:1.polylog-space autoreducible ⇔ polylog-space mitotic,2.log-space mitotic ⇒ log-space autoreducible ⇒ (logn⋅loglogn)-space mitotic,3.relative to an oracle, log-space autoreducible ⇏ log-space mitotic. The oracle is an infinite family of graphs whose construction combines arguments from Ramsey theory and Kolmogorov complexity

Upward Translation of Optimal and P-Optimal Proof Systems in the Boolean Hierarchy over NP

We study the existence of optimal and p-optimal proof systems for classes in the Boolean hierarchy over $\mathrm{NP}$. Our main results concern $\mathrm{DP}$, i.e., the second level of this hierarchy: If all sets in $\mathrm{DP}$ have p-optimal proof systems, then all sets in $\mathrm{coDP}$ have p-optimal proof systems. The analogous implication for optimal proof systems fails relative to an oracle. As a consequence, we clarify such implications for all classes $\mathcal{C}$ and $\mathcal{D}$ in the Boolean hierarchy over $\mathrm{NP}$: either we can prove the implication or show that it fails relative to an oracle. Furthermore, we show that the sets $\mathrm{SAT}$ and $\mathrm{TAUT}$ have p-optimal proof systems, if and only if all sets in the Boolean hierarchy over $\mathrm{NP}$ have p-optimal proof systems which is a new characterization of a conjecture studied by Pudl\'ak

Advances and applications of automata on words and trees : executive summary

Seminar: 10501 - Advances and Applications of Automata on Words and Trees. The aim of the seminar was to discuss and systematize the recent fast progress in automata theory and to identify important directions for future research. For this, the seminar brought together more than 40 researchers from automata theory and related fields of applications. We had 19 talks of 30 minutes and 5 one-hour lectures leaving ample room for discussions. In the following we describe the topics in more detail

Advances and applications of automata on words and trees : abstracts collection

From 12.12.2010 to 17.12.2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10501 "Advances and Applications of Automata on Words and Trees" was held in Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

Circuit Satisfiability and Constraint Satisfaction around Skolem Arithmetic

We study interactions between Skolem Arithmetic and certain classes of Circuit Satisfiability and Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). We revisit results of Glaßer et al. [1] in the context of CSPs and settle the major open question from that paper, finding a certain satisfiability problem on circuits—involving complement, intersection, union and multiplication—to be decidable. This we prove using the decidability of Skolem Arithmetic. Then we solve a second question left open in [1] by proving a tight upper bound for the similar circuit satisfiability problem involving just intersection, union and multiplication. We continue by studying first-order expansions of Skolem Arithmetic without constants, (N;×), as CSPs. We find already here a rich landscape of problems with non-trivial instances that are in P as well as those that are NP-complete

Verbotsmuster und Worterweiterungen für Konkatenationshierarchien

Starfree regular languages can be build up from alphabet letters by using only Boolean operations and concatenation. The complexity of these languages can be measured with the so-called dot-depth. This measure leads to concatenation hierarchies like the dot-depth hierarchy (DDH) and the closely related Straubing-Thérien hierarchy (STH). The question whether the single levels of these hierarchies are decidable is still open and is known as the dot-depth problem. In this thesis we prove/reprove the decidability of some lower levels of both hierarchies. More precisely, we characterize these levels in terms of patterns in finite automata (subgraphs in the transition graph) that are not allowed. Therefore, such characterizations are called forbidden-pattern characterizations. The main results of the thesis are as follows: forbidden-pattern characterization for level 3/2 of the DDH (this implies the decidability of this level) decidability of the Boolean hierarchy over level 1/2 of the DDH definition of decidable hierarchies having close relations to the DDH and STH Moreover, we prove/reprove the decidability of the levels 1/2 and 3/2 of both hierarchies in terms of forbidden-pattern characterizations. We show the decidability of the Boolean hierarchies over level 1/2 of the DDH and over level 1/2 of the STH. A technique which uses word extensions plays the central role in the proofs of these results. With this technique it is possible to treat the levels 1/2 and 3/2 of both hierarchies in a uniform way. Furthermore, it can be used to prove the decidability of the mentioned Boolean hierarchies. Among other things we provide a combinatorial tool that allows to partition words of arbitrary length into factors of bounded length such that every second factor u leads to a loop with label u in a given finite automaton.Sternfreie reguläre Sprachen können aus Buchstaben unter Verwendung Boolescher Operationen und Konkatenation aufgebaut werden. Die Komplexität solcher Sprachen lässt sich durch die sogenannte "Dot-Depth" messen. Dieses Maß führt zu Konkatenationshierarchien wie der Dot-Depth-Hierachie (DDH) und der Straubing-Thérien-Hierarchie (STH). Die Frage nach der Entscheidbarkeit der einzelnen Stufen dieser Hierarchien ist als (immer noch offenes) Dot-Depth-Problem bekannt. In dieser Arbeit beweisen wir die Entscheidbarkeit einiger unterer Stufen beider Hierarchien. Genauer gesagt charakterisieren wir diese Stufen durch das Verbot von bestimmten Mustern in endlichen Automaten. Solche Charakterisierungen werden Verbotsmustercharakterisierungen genannt. Die Hauptresultate der Arbeit lassen sich wie folgt zusammenfassen: Verbotsmustercharakterisierung der Stufe 3/2 der DDH (dies hat die Entscheidbarkeit dieser Stufe zur Folge) Entscheidbarkeit der Booleschen Hierarchie über der Stufe 1/2 der DDH Definition von entscheidbaren Hierarchien mit engen Verbindungen zur DDH und STH Darüber hinaus beweisen wir die Entscheidbarkeit der Stufen 1/2 und 3/2 beider Hierarchien (wieder mittels Verbotsmustercharakterisierungen) und die der Booleschen Hierarchien über den Stufen 1/2 der DDH bzw. STH. Dabei stützen sich die Beweise größtenteils auf eine Technik, die von Eigenschaften bestimmter Worterweiterungen Gebrauch macht. Diese Technik erlaubt eine einheitliche Vorgehensweise bei der Untersuchung der Stufen 1/2 und 3/2 beider Hierarchien. Außerdem wird sie in den Beweisen der Entscheidbarkeit der genannten Booleschen Hierarchien verwendet. Unter anderem wird ein kombinatorisches Hilfsmittel zur Verfügung gestellt, das es erlaubt, Wörter beliebiger Länge in Faktoren beschränkter Länge zu zerlegen, so dass jeder zweite Faktor u zu einer u-Schleife in einem gegebenen endlichen Automaten führt

Counting with Counterfree Automata

We study the power of balanced and unbalanced regular leaf-languages. First, we investigate (i) regular languages that are polylog-time reducible to languages in dot-depth 1/2 and (ii) regular languages that are polylog-time decidable. For both classes we provide • forbidden-pattern characterizations, and • characterizations in terms of regular expressions. Both classes are decidable. The intersection of class (i) with its complement is exactly class (ii). We apply our observations and obtain three consequences. 1. Gap theorems for balanced regular-leaf-language definable classes C and D: (a) Either C is contained in NP, orC contains coUP. (b) Either D is contained in P,orD contains UP or coUP. Also we extend both theorems such that no promise classes are involved. Formerly, such gap theorems were known only for the unbalanced approach. 2. Polylog-time reductions can tremendously decrease dot-depth complexity (despite that they cannot count). We exploit a weak type of counting which can be done by counterfree automata, and construct languages of arbitrary dot-depth that are reducible to languages in dot-depth 1/2. 3. Unbalanced starfree leaf-languages can be much stronger than balanced ones. We construct starfree regular languages Ln such that the balanced leaf-language class of L n is contained in NP, but the unbalanced leaf-language class of L n contains level n of the unambiguous alternation hierarchy. This demonstrates the power of unbalanced computations.